For medical directors, CMOs & clinic owners

Complete oversight of every chart.

Rubik MD screens every encounter against the sources your clinical leadership already trusts, then gives medical leadership a ranked queue of the cases that need attention. Each case includes the chart evidence and source.

  • 96% accuracy on our proprietary GLP-1 benchmark
  • Private: charts stay in your environment

Built for specialty clinics

Weight management & Metabolic Hormone health ADHD & Psychiatry Fertility and more
Halftone image of clinicians in a review meeting

The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp

Rembrandt van Rijn, 1632

See the walkthrough
$56M

Average of the 50 largest U.S. medical malpractice verdicts in 2024. $32M in 2022; $48M in 2023.

The Doctors Company and AMA

1–5%

Formal peer-review case volume reported relative to hospital admissions in national survey data.

National U.S. hospital peer-review survey

Weeks to months

Peer-review turnaround reported across surveyed U.S. hospital programs.

National U.S. hospital peer-review survey

You sign for every chart. Now you can see them.

One busy site can produce more charts than a medical director can reasonably read. Across more sites and prescribers, each team builds its own filter for what gets reviewed. The result is incomplete visibility and inconsistent oversight.

Oversight that scales with the
organization.

One standard across every site

Review each encounter against the same trusted standards, regardless of location or prescriber.

Consistent

Put judgment where it matters

Surface the exceptions that require clinical judgment, instead of asking leaders to hunt through the full cohort.

Focused

Keep a complete review record

Capture the evidence, decision, and note for every resolved flag in one place.

Documented

Every flag comes with its evidence.

See what triggered the flag: the exact chart line and the source behind it.

  • Sources your clinical leadership already trusts
  • The matched chart evidence shown beside the source
  • Read-only review outside the treating clinician’s workflow

Missing labs

Treatment started or continued without the required workup documented.

From 200 encounters to the 12 that need review.

Example weekly batch

Rubik MD review queue showing a weekly batch with prioritized flags and case detail

Start with the exceptions, not the entire week.

The queue keeps the case, chart evidence, cited source, and review decision in one place. Medical leadership can move from a flagged case to a recorded resolution without reconstructing the chart.

Review scope This week Result
Encounters screened 200 Full cohort
Cases flagged 12 Prioritized
High priority 6 Review first

Treatment moved forward. The baseline workup did not.

Flag: Baseline metabolic panel missing

Semaglutide was started without the baseline metabolic panel required by the clinic’s trusted standards.

Evidence: Visit note, July 8 · Source: baseline labs required within 30 days · See the walkthrough →

From a small sample to organization-wide visibility.

Rubik MD gives medical leadership a clearer view of the care actually being delivered across every location and program.

Dimension Without Rubik MD With Rubik MD
Coverage A small sample selected manually. Every chart screened.
Focus Leadership must decide where to look. Cases that need judgment are prioritized, with the reason attached.
Evidence The reviewer reconstructs the issue from the chart. The chart evidence and clinical source arrive together.
Review record Review notes vary by person and location. The decision and rationale are recorded consistently.

Straight answers for the people who sign for care.

The practical questions buyers ask before opening the demo or starting a pilot.

What does Rubik MD check charts against?

Rubik MD reviews charts against the sources your clinical leadership already trusts and uses to guide care. Every flag shows the relevant source and the chart evidence that triggered it.

Does Rubik MD make clinical decisions?

No. Rubik MD is read-only. It surfaces cases and evidence for clinical leadership; it does not diagnose, prescribe, recommend treatment, or write back into the chart.

What does implementation require?

We begin with one location and one read-only export of notes, labs, and prescriptions. There is no write-back into the EHR and no change to the treating clinician’s workflow. The first review batch can be produced within days of receiving the export.

What happens to our data?

Nothing. Rubik MD runs on local, private technology, and your clinic’s data never leaves your premises.

How do you manage false positives and misses?

Rubik MD prioritizes cases by risk and uncertainty and shows the evidence behind every flag, so clinical leadership can confirm or dismiss it efficiently. Performance is evaluated on your charts and trusted standards during the pilot.

See what your team would review on Monday.

See the review flow and discuss how it fits your organization.